C WALTON LIMITED

Trend Analysis

The average time taken for C. WALTON LIMITED to pay invoices has decreased from 31 days in Jul 2022 to 25 days in Dec 2023. The percentage of invoices paid within 30 days has increased from 52% to 70%. However, there has been an increase in the percentage of invoices paid later than 60 days from 8% to 6%. The company's ability to pay invoices within agreed terms has improved, with a decrease from 49% to 5%.

Volatility Analysis

The average time taken to pay invoices has fluctuated over the three periods, with a decrease from 31 days to 18 days and then an increase to 25 days. The percentage of invoices paid within 30 days has also fluctuated, with an increase from 52% to 77% and then a decrease to 70%. The volatility in these two metrics suggests that the company may be experiencing changes in its payment processes or financial stability.

Summary Analysis

In the latest period, C. WALTON LIMITED has shown improvement in its payment processes, with a decrease in the average time taken to pay invoices and an increase in the percentage of invoices paid within 30 days. However, there has been a slight increase in the percentage of invoices paid later than 60 days. The company's ability to pay invoices within agreed terms has significantly improved, with a decrease from 49% to 5%. The shortest standard payment period remains at 1 day. Additionally, the company has shown a trend of decreasing payment times and increasing on-time payments over the three periods.

Payment Terms

Dispute Resolution Process

Purpose Delivery of goods or services to Manheim Limited may sometimes lead to disputes between the business and the supplier. These disputes can vary in nature but are most commonly based around quality of delivery of the goods or services requested or payment disputes. This policy documents the procedure and escalation process in which should be followed in order to resolve any disputes within the supply chain. Please note this policy describes the processes to be followed in the examples of sub-standard delivery of goods and services and payment disputes however where disputes have arisen outside of these examples, the GSCD will decide which escalation route to follow. Applicability and Authority • This Policy applies to all contracted suppliers of goods or services to Manheim Ltd. • This Policy applies to all Manheim ltd departments and supersedes any practices in existence prior to its effective date • The GSCD of the given supplier category is the authority on managing the relationship with all suppliers within the category. • The Group General is the final authority on contractual terms of agreement. • The Chief Financial Officer is final authority on all financial aspects of any dispute. Definitions Dispute Resolution: A process for resolving differences between two or more parties or groups. In business practice the resolution seeks to achieve fairness for all participants. Procedure Should a dispute arise, the initial relevant parties should try to resolve at the transactional level by contacting the supplier direct and discussing the issues which have arisen. If no satisfactory outcome is achieved, it is the responsibility of the initial relevant parties to document all the facts relating to the issue and inform the relevant GSCD whom is responsible for the given category of supplier. At this point the GSCD will take control of negotiations directly with the supplier management / senior management in order to reach resolution whether through contractual review or an amicable outcome. If, again no resolution is made, the GSCD will then escalate through the Manheim Ltd hierarchy to take control of the negotiations. This process will then continue as per the below escalation examples. Once a resolution has been agreed, communication will be made to the initial party of the outcome.

Other Payment Information